AI GTM Product Roadmap
When AI proposals pile up and the board asked what the spend returned.
The number it servesReps at quota
An account can fit your ICP and none of your plays.
We score your target accounts against the plays you fund and test the ranking on your own closed deals, to lift win rate on target accounts.
We start where the win rate is decided, upstream of the rep, then test a better system against yours, double-blind: nobody knows which system ranked which account until the votes lock.
Win rate by territory and segment
Deals won over deals won plus lost; it moves once new assignments are live and deals have closed. Inside four weeks, the proof is the blind preference against a margin agreed up front.
When the territory plan locks soon and nobody has tested the account list.
Kickoff is weeks away. Territories need cutting, quotas need setting, and you're defending the scoring model. Every call is recorded, and nobody has read them for what they say about fit.
Pull your last ten closed-lost deals and check what their scores said at qualification.
Where qualification and fit break.
Scores with their reasons.
Which one your reviewers prefer.
The decision, its owners and the roadmap.
Your kickoff sets the deadline; with no hard date, we test one system and hand over the roadmap.
A sales leader who can change assignments, and a RevOps lead to tally the votes.
When AI proposals pile up and the board asked what the spend returned.
The number it servesReps at quota
When a funded campaign launches in four weeks and nobody has the week to sharpen it.
The number it servesCampaign pipeline per dollar
It shows when each piece starts, what it costs, and the day we read its number.